Minutes from the network meeting 09.03.2012
The meeting opened up with at short presentation of the network by the present convenor, Christian Horst from Department of Education, ARTS, Aarhus University.
Convenor and co-convenor. In Jyväskylä, NERA 2011, it was decided to work with two convenors: A principal convenor and a co-convenor. The principal convenor will be from the country which hosts the NERA conference. The co-convenor will come from the country which will host the NERA conference the following year.
In 2013 the conference will be held in Iceland. Hanna Ragnarsdóttir from the University of Iceland will take over as convenor in 2012-13, when this conference is over. In 2014 Lillehammer in Norway will host the NERA-conference and a person from Norway will be appointed as co-convenor in order to become convenor in 2014.
Themes from the meeting. At the meeting two major issues were interwoven in the discussion: a) an organizational issue about preconference, symposia etc. and b) the further development of our network (concepts and theories). Below we have separated the two issues in order to come up with a more concise and short account of the discussion.
About preconferences and symposia. It was decided to continue to arrange pre-conferences. The normal network sessions are so pressed that it is quite impossible to engage in more profound discussions about research and theory in the field.
The preconference offers this possibility. However, participants will have to realize that they will have to find the money (extra night in a hotel, food etc.) in their own institutions. NERA cannot fund us. This could be related to the organization of symposia during the conference and discussions in the network meeting. To support this development further a blog or a discussion forum could be established in relation to the home site. Together these possibilities could further more fundamental discussions about the field(s) we research.
For NERA 2013 in Iceland we will organize a preconference. As we anyway will have to arrive the day before, it gives us the possibility to arrange a late afternoon-early evening session on a sandwich, and continue in the morning (form hrs.10-12) before the conference opens. To this end we could choose some common texts in relation to presentations, but with ample time to continue our discussion. There was a general agreement to develop this concept. The convenors will work on this and also invite others to participate.
It was further mentioned if we should develop common projects, initiatives etc. with reference to experiences from the special issue in Intercultural education.
About concepts and theories. The discussion brought forward a number of concepts, what they signified and how they were founded epistemologically and what type of discourse the different concepts related to, i.e. multicultural, intercultural, diversity, intersectionality, multiplicity, complexity, adapted education, discrimination, anti-racist education, social justice, equality and equal opportunity welfare state, international studies, inclusion, exclusion, transnational, globalization, glocalization and education, plural(istic) society, critical, (probably some more concepts which we failed to take down, sorry – please add up)
– Is it possible to combine some concepts with others in a fruitful way? (Please note how the listing of concepts (and possible combinations of concepts) can point to common (rather wide) foci on certain aspects of diversity, multiplicity, differences).
The discussion took different directions. One position was to open up for being recognized in a wider international context, relating to networks under ECER, e.g. with the name: “Social justice and intercultural education” or a similar one: “Social justice and education in the multicultural society.” Is it a good idea, or is it a problem to share a name or align closely with a name in ECER?
Another position was to be more open – both conceptually – and in relation to other NERA networks: The concepts: “Social justice” and “Diversity” are not used concepts in other networks in NERA.
The concept could include understandings like intersectionality embracing different social and cultural identity markers (diversity), and equality, equal opportunity, anti-racism, citizenship, democracy etc. can be identified in the understanding of ‘social justice’. The combination of the two concepts could easily be brought in relation to different organizational fields or levels of education: representation in different subjects, in legislation, in curriculum, in school organization, teacher education etc.
Would this invite other presenters to our network? Would we open up ourselves and do presentations in other networks? How to counteract conceptual confinement? Could there be joint-networks meetings (curriculum, gender, diverse learners, early childhood, school development etc.)? But this certainly requires more administration.
Pros and cons on both perspectives were discussed but without coming to conclusions.
Thirdly, it was stressed that we should not lose focus on power-relations and how the nation state dominates the general cultural and social space (national identity and whiteness). This socio-historical position structures the different social fields (including education) within and against which ethnic minorities are positioned. The presentation of this conference’s main theme “Everyday life” gave impressions of a very white everyday life (which was probably not intended, and what does this then tell us?).
The discussion will continue in Iceland 2013 and if possible in a coming discussion space on our home site.
Frédérique Brossard Børhaug & Christian Horst